Skip to content
Home
Project
Selected DCs
Consortium
News
Blog
Contact us
DC Training Survey
Scientific Poster Options
Questionnaire of satisfaction with the training programme
Name
First
Last
Email
Content & Relevance
The training objectives were clearly explained.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The content was relevant to my research / PhD project.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The training addressed my learning needs.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The examples/case studies were appropriate and helpful.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The training was useful for both academic and professional development.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
Delivery & Methodology
The trainers demonstrated strong knowledge of the topic.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The delivery style was engaging and easy to follow.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The training balanced theory and practical examples.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
Interaction and participation were encouraged.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The training materials were clear and well-structured.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
Organisation & Logistics
The trainings were well-organised.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The duration of each training was appropriate.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The venue/online platform was suitable and accessible.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
Technical support and coordination were effective.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
Outcomes & Impact
I acquired new knowledge or skills.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
I can apply what I learned in my research or work.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
The training contributed to my personal and career development.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
I would recommend these trainings to other researchers.
(Required)
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neutral
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
Open Feedback
What did you find most useful about the training?
(Required)
Which training did you find most interesting?
(Required)
Which training did you find most useful?
(Required)
Choose one...
Managing your PhD
AI and ML for the method development of chromatographic methods
Targeted analysis of micropollutants in several environmental matrices (both degraded and undegraded samples
Untargeted analysis to identify byproducts in degraded environmental samples
Wastewater treatment plant – Aquafin Site-visit, including training
Classical statistical methods and small size): presentation of statistical tests, power analysis for small sample size
Case study of site visit. Resource Recovery from Aerobic/Anaerobic Treatment Plants: Process Design and Group Presentation.
Industrial site visit to ’s-Hertogenbosch
More advanced statistical techniques): outliers, robust statistics and censored statistics
IP protection and valorization
How to Stand Up with Your Scientific Poster
What did you find most useful about the trainings program?
(Required)
What could be improved in future training sessions?
(Required)
Additional comments or suggestions:
Go to Top
Home
Project
Team
Selected DCs
Consortium
News
Blog
Clear
Search
Home
Project
Selected DCs
Consortium
News
Blog
